Message Forum


 
go to bottom 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page      

06/14/22 09:04 AM #109    

 

Daniel Lesnick

Dear Frankie – I've been following the "discussion" involving Dick Hobby and a few of our other classmates, and I greatly appreciated your humanizing contribution.

To me, there’s no question but that issues relating to climate change will never be fully settled or agreed upon in our class pages – or anywhere else. Moreover, climate change is obviously just one of myriad issues about which the people of this nation (and many other nations) are irreconcilably divided.

You raise the question of what one can do that may make a difference for the better. And (if I read you correctly) you suggest that our responses should include more that comes from the heart and less from a need to defeat an opponent in an argument. I agree.

I have never been able to heavily devote myself to the political activism that was emblematic of Oberlin in our time there. Voltaire's Candide has been more my style – that of cultivating my own garden, or to be a bit more precise, doing what I can close to home rather than taking on the world. As I look back on my life, I can understand that this is why I became a history professor. While I loved, loved, loved the research and conveying of information I did in the fields of medieval and Renaissance history, my greatest professional love was using historical material to help students access, appreciate, and actually enjoy their own analytical thinking. (I no longer feel comfortable using the term "critical thinking" because "critical" now seems to be misused to feed current-day "oppositionalism".)

A couple of years ago, in light of Trump's and his followers' ridiculous claims that the 2020 presidential election was stolen, I found myself bothered – or perhaps I should say puzzled. My impulse was not to join those who tried to prove them wrong; I believed this would be a fruitless endeavor, since valid proofs would fall on deaf ears. Rather, I wanted to try to understand WHY 74 million people voted for Trump in 2020 election and WHY 35%-40% of the adult U.S. population would actually believe the big lie. So, I spent some months exploring and writing about the WHY. If you are interested in this exploration of the broader causes of major current issues/problems facing us, I invite you to read my essay (18 type-written pages) at https://democracyforbeginners.weebly.com/essay.html.

Best regards,

Dan Lesnick

P.S. Quite a few years ago, when I first became a hospice volunteer, I observed that as people grow older and physically (and perhaps mentally) less able and eventually may be approaching the end of life, their world becomes smaller and smaller until, close to the very end, it may be no larger than the area immediately surrounding their bed. I think that, as I find myself aging, this awareness is part of what motivates me to try to understand the broader, wider-world causes of those frightful changes we see, read about, and experience.


06/14/22 11:33 AM #110    

 

Ralph Shapira

I just posted chapter 2 of my autobio on my Classmate Profiles page.  It includes a good story about our beloved friend and leader Paul Safyan, a high school classmate.  Next up will be the Oberlin chapter.


06/15/22 08:08 AM #111    

Peter Griswold

Recommended reading - I just read Ralph Shapira's second chapter of his autobiography which is posted under his name in Classmate Profiles - funny in  places, revealing in others but most importantly, a meaningful story about a time in his life when he, like the rest of us, was navigating the path into adulthood, achieving a degree of independence, becoming aware of his vulnerabilities, and enjoying successes. The swimming meet and the sweatshirt stories are classics.  Thanks for sharing your great memories, Ralph.  


06/15/22 02:32 PM #112    

 

Robert Baker

Dan Lesnick's article is really an excellent analysis of how we got to our current political situation, and it raises the important questions that need to be answered for us to get out of it. Although it does not address the powerfully divisive issues of racism and sexism, those issues are partially driven by the economic issues he does raise. I think he's right that minds will not begin to change by having facts thrown at them; but that raises the question of how those minds do change on racial, religious and gender issues. Addressing the questions Dan raises is a necessary, but not sufficient, solution to our current political quagmire. Racism and sexism are anathema to a liberal democracy, and must be addressed in a way that wins the hearts and minds of the vast majority of citizens. Together with the economic suggestions Dan makes, we could then make headway against the anti-democratic beliefs to which so many now subscribe (and encouraged by Trump, the Koch brothers, and other billionaires in their own self-interest)). The lack of social interest and selfish philosophy of Ayn Rand, which dominates much of society, needs to be fought by examples of altruism and compassion for our fellow citizens. 


06/16/22 06:50 AM #113    

 

Anne Ashcraft (Maher)

Ralph Shapira's celebratory memoirs of a childhood spent idling in the loveliness of the Appalachian countryside...sensitively written, vibrant. Kudos, Ralph.

06/18/22 11:49 AM #114    

 

Ralph Shapira

I have just posted to my Classmate Profile Chapter 3 of my autobio about my four years at Oberlin.  I hope you won't be overly shocked by one of my longest held secrets -- the predatory actions of one of our most prominent professors towards me.  I wonder whether any of you had similar experiences . . .  those were very different times than these. 


06/20/22 10:13 AM #115    

 

Daniel Lesnick

Thanks to Robert Baker for his generous and constructive comments on my essay. I confess to limited understanding of the complexities of racism and sexism, but I'm confident that he is correct about the important role of "altruism and compassion for our fellow citizens" in the fight against these indecent, anti-democratic scourges. And, having just now read his Profile Questions and Answers, I greatly respect him for having devoted an enormous part of his life to putting these ideals into very concrete and highly impactful practice.


06/21/22 03:27 PM #116    

 

Richard Zitrin

In addition to his abiding basketball skills, Bob Baker has for so many decades been a champion of truly equitable justice!


06/21/22 07:24 PM #117    

 

Ralph Shapira

Just posted Chapter 4 on my seven years in Berkeley on my Classmate Profile page.  There won't be another for a while -- my 27 year legal career and family life is a lot to get my arms around.  Thanks to those who have posted nice comments on my page.


06/21/22 08:13 PM #118    

 

John Robinson

“Just read chapter 2 of Ralph Shapira’s autobiography on his profile page, and am looking forward to the next thrilling episode with a mixture of equal parts fear and fascination. Will names be named, and if so can I get out of town ahead of the posse? Will the events that culminated in the great Dascomb ice cream raffle and the dispute with the chaplin come up? Will his sneakers receive their just, though smelly, due, and how will he explain our year in East so that it makes any sense?  
 
“Ralph, remember that many of our colleagues are no longer with us, so be generous, and many more are still here, so a measure of discretion and a quick perusal of the libel laws might be in order. But keep writing.  I can’t wait to see how we all turn out after we grow up. You have a good eye for the crucial details that humanize your story.”

 


07/07/22 01:21 PM #119    

 

Ralph Shapira

I'm reading and greatly enjoying Rich Zitrin's book, Trial Lawyer, A Life Defending People Against Power, available from Amazon.  His career as a criminal defense lawyer is as different from mine defending big corporations in business litigation as night and day.  It's an eye-opener into a fascinating world.  Bravura performance, Rich.  HIGHLY RECOMMENDED.


07/07/22 06:59 PM #120    

 

Richard Zitrin

Thanks so much, Ralph! Very different careers, true, but winding up in a similar place, both with memoirs. - Rich


07/09/22 10:10 AM #121    

 

Reed Cosper

Ralph, I read and enjoy your memoir, every word of it. And I’ve added here and there a positive comment. Today I take issue with your choice of the word “groomed.”  Groomed is more than a word. It’s hot button concept, and in the context of a twenty-one year old man at the end of his undergraduate education, it’s inappropriate. It’s a tabloid word. 

When applied to a sexual encounter, it’s use should be restricted to children. You, I think, were seduced, not groomed, and if you need an explanation, the classic one is readily available: “I was drunk; my judgment was impaired.” That would be taking some responsibility for what took place. Other available options are also present: “I learned then and there that I am not gay” being one of them. 

In high school, at Oberlin, and in early adulthood I was frequently groomed in the sense that you use the word. Being innocent, ignorant, ambivalent afraid about sex, I generated an ambiguous vibe. But, even at sixteen I had access to the word “No.”  I have said no to men and women. Perhaps too often. And men and women have said no to me.  As I grow old, I question the wisdom of my reliance on a hard firm no, when a softer gentler no, or a maybe, would have sufficed.  Having “no” in my vocabulary did, however, provide the advantage of owning responsibility for things that otherwise may have “happened” to me.

There remains the student-teacher dynamic.  It was late in your college career. You were likely to ace the course anyway. Your relation to Professor X at that point was more or less equal. Still, professor-student sex is inherently unequal, thus inherently an ethics problem.

I can say that the quality of undergraduate education would suffer if gender bent professors and queer undergraduate peers were barred from academe.  That’s the underlying value of just saying no instead of saying groomed.


07/10/22 03:32 PM #122    

 

Paul Safyan

Reed:

thanks for your comments here.  They reflect a great deal of both morality and sexuality.  I particularly recognize the places of both indiviudal and agency and the power dynamic in Ralph's story and the judgement is not an easy one to make.  Certainly your objection to the word "Groomed" is context-senstive.

 

Paul


07/11/22 01:37 AM #123    

 

Ralph Shapira

Thank you, Reed, for educating me on the sensitivity of the word "groomed."  I wasn't aware of the distinctions you describe.  I'll think it over and perhaps will change it.  

And thank you for reading my pieces and commenting generously.       

Ralph

 

 


07/11/22 11:02 AM #124    

 

Reed Cosper

Ralph,

Five minutes after I hit "send" I regretted it.  My tone was waspish, not a drop of kindness in it. You write beautifully. Reed


07/12/22 10:00 AM #125    

Judith Klavans

Reed,

When I read your message, what I thought was that Ralph had pushed a button for you.  So I'm thinking, Reed needs to look inside - your message was not poorly intended, I know it.  

What thing I did think about, though, from this interchange, is how much we women had to face the notion of being groomed (pace everyone!) since this was the main way for guys to get "what they wanted from us".  In fact, many of us were totally scared to say no over and over again since males had power in our society, regardless of position (i.e. teacher-student, that one is clear but any male-female was an imbalance of power.)

So that's something really hard to think about and get clarity on for me.  When I read about straight guys' adventures, I do wonder how the women on the other side may have felt sometimes (not always, trust me!)

This is an important issue and in a way, without your rancor, Reed, and without your generous response, Ralph, it would not be happening.

Power on, and pleased to have this as part of our 55th.  We have come a long way,

Judy


07/13/22 10:31 AM #126    

 

Reed Cosper

Judy, You're right.  I read Ralph's memoire and, aside from the fact that it is well writen, becasue it's well written, it resonates in a personal way. We were all there, then. I wish I had taken more time before posting my comment to ponder and shed the personnal stuff. I was thinking of Roger Goodman, and Dean Langler, and of Ralph's gay prof's transgression (if that's the word), and gay people I have known, and on and on. It's a bit too complicated to include in a posting. It certainly did not "improve" what I had to say to Ralph. (And I barely knew Ralph.). And thank you for perceiving the intention. This kind of forum invites impuilsive comment,  When I pause and think and sculpt, I wind up editing and then editing some more. And then the moment to comment passes. And now I am about to hit "send," and wondering if its wise or otherwise.


07/13/22 11:44 AM #127    

 

Reed Cosper

[after grocery shopping] .  .  . and heteronormative culture, and Ron DeSantis, and the preternatural capacity of the Republican party to exploit divisive messaging such as "grooming."


07/13/22 07:00 PM #128    

 

Richard Zitrin

Reed and Ralph, I think this dialogue has been great, and honest, which is so important. Kudos to you both. Judy, you nailed it - no surprise there, so thank you. We all were living in a different world then. Pressures on college women were extraordinary, without any (or much of) the enlightenment and support that came later. And we (heterosexual) men were, by and large, dolts ignorant of any sense of true equality, especially regarding sexual invitations. I look back at our behavior with a good deal of wincing.

I think this forum has shown that we've grown, and (I hope) that our daughters and granddaughters, and certainly our gay friends, will have a far easier time than we did. Putting aside, for the moment, the disastrous state of our democracy....

Rich


07/18/22 07:18 AM #129    

 

Ralph Shapira

I have just posted on my Classmate Profile Chapter 5 of my autobio about my 27 years as a lawyer specializing in business litigation at one of the nation's premier large law firms.  I promise you it contains some pretty good war stories.


07/20/22 12:50 PM #130    

 

Reed Cosper

Like Ralph, I am enjoying the opportunity to write, sometimes civil liberty / mental illness, sometimes memory, sometines just something that needs to come out.  I do not write fast, a page a day re-written seven or eight times is about my speed. 

In Memoriam
It was May 1945, and it was World War 2 in the South Pacific. It was one month after the bloody assault on Iwo Jima, and it was three months before the atom bomb on Hiroshima.
Our mother was a recent college graduate. She, along with a boat full of other young American women, volunteered to sail to Hawaii at government expense to do good works and to pair up with American soldiers. Our father was a Marine Corps Sergeant just returned from battle at Iwo Jima.
After Iwo, my mother and father were in a hurry to get married. They were an impossible match.
They had a rocky marriage. In the seventh year of the marriage there was a great reconciliation. They fell in love for a second time and had a love child. It was my brother Dwight, born on January 19, 1953.
I don’t think that Dwight’s childhood was easy. His older brothers, I at least, tormented him mercilessly, and after that I ignored him. When Dwight was seven, our mother returned to teaching. He was placed in a lady’s home during the day. This was before there was something called “day care.” The lady physically and emotionally abused him. This we learned long after the fact.
Dwight was a smart kid living with two smart older brothers. Brother Bill was a terrific drummer, and our home was hang-out for 1960’s adolescents who liked folk music. Dwight soaked up the teenage action.
By sophomore year in high school, Dwight was writing poetry, a habit for life, and he was fed up with his public high school. By then I was in college coming home summers with new opinions and reservoirs of confidence. Dwight soaked that in too. I decided for the sake of a better education Dwight belonged in a private school. In January 1969, he enrolled in the Colorado Rocky Mountain School just outside Aspen. He hated it.
After a month at CRMS, a grown-up college friend of mine, Judy, showed up in Aspen, communed with Dwight for a day or two, and abruptly, without consulting anyone, pulled him out of school. There began a four-year odyssey with Judy, a darkly exotic, gorgeous, smart first-generation Chinese-American woman from Seattle. They traipsed around the southwest, slept under the stars, dipped into the Yucatan Peninsula, and drove up the California coast to Seattle. Dwight tested for his GED and enrolled in a junior college. Two years later he got a scholarship at a liberal arts college—Western Washington State—in Everett where he got a good education and graduated an art major with honors. Somewhere in there he married Judy. It was 1974, he was barely twenty-one and he was a college graduate.
Dwight’s marriage was an unequal exchange. Judy was boss and he was appendage. He was oppressed and restless, and after his degree he shipped his college art projects home to Aurora.
He left Judy and hitchhiked to Boulder. He was six foot three and one hundred eighty pounds with ash blond hair and gigantic, sincere brown eyes. An Adonis, and a flower child.
He did not want, ever, to work a conventional job. Period, full stop. And though this meant an unconventional life and being broke, he never deviated. He was a poet and an artist. He studied Buddhism. He enrolled in the Naropa Institute . He lived free. He experimented with drugs. He seduced girls, girls seduced him. He took psychedelics. He mixed in with Boulder street people and drunks. He went four days without sleep high on more than just one drug. He woke up in a hospital with a chronic psychotic illness. This kind of thing happened in those days.
He enjoyed the mania and the psychosis. He learned that the quickest way out of a hospital is total cooperation, signifying to “them” that you’re stable. And then it’s back on the street writing poetry, drinking-drugging and learning to walk the line between safe insanity and involuntary hospitalization. And now he was the kind of guy people back away from after brief conversation. Still writing poetry.
He became an expert skier. He took a jump off a mogul straight into a tree and shattered his left leg. He found a stray dog to love. He followed an itinerant evangelical into the southwest. His leg didn’t heal. He came to Colorado and doctors proposed amputation. He had a second round of surgery and his leg got three inches shorter, but no amputation. When he recovered, he found work as a carpenter. He worked in a warehouse. He drove a big truck all over Colorado. Made home deliveries of renal supplies for people with kidney failure. With help from Kathy, see below, he bought a house. He still wrote poetry.
He was fortunate to have access to a good community mental health system in Colorado. He developed a long relationship with a psychotherapist. He bonded with other people at the center. In therapy Dwight learned to manage medications, sort of. He learned that he has to take a pill every day, but not a whole pill, half dose will do. It kept him on the right side of the line. When he woke mornings with anger, he took a whole pill. This regimen kept him out of the hospital for the next four decades. He wrote poetry.
He lived with severe persistent mental illness. His pride and determination would not let him apply for disability benefits and Medicaid. He kept writing. Two poems were published in a journal at Arizona State University.
In 1991 Dwight went to the twentieth high school reunion for the public high school he dropped out of. Maybe it was a joint reunion for Aurora Central and Hinkley because he ran into Kathy Drake, who went to Central. Kathy was the girl who lived two doors up the street. And though none of us knew it, she and Dwight were in love before they knew the words. They never dated. They went to different high schools, he dropped out. In 1992 they were married. He wrote his poetry.
He sold his house, moved to Illinois to be with her. She was soul mate and angel. They both knew that. Living with Kathy liberated his artist soul. He performed in community theater: Played Chief in a stage performance of “Coocoo’s Nest.” Had a singing role as the butcher in “Fiddler on the Roof.” Taught an adult education class in ceramics. They stayed married twenty-five years.
It was not easy for Kathy to be Dwight’s wife, but she did it with grace and with love. And even at the end, after his last long psychotic episode, after his demand for a divorce, after his fall into homelessness and a nursing facility, she loved and supported him. No one expected Kathy to die first.
On March 13, 2022, Kathy was found dead, sitting in her Lazy Boy in front of the TV. There was no need for an autopsy. She simply passed. Three weeks later to the day, April 3, 2022, Dwight died in a nursing facility. The Death Certificate indicated a cardiac infarctioin. It may as will have read “broken heart.”


07/21/22 01:08 PM #131    

Jessica Rosenberg

Reed, this is beautiful.

 


07/21/22 10:08 PM #132    

 

Robert Baker

Reed, I didn't know. 


07/22/22 03:15 PM #133    

Jeffrey Liebman

 

.A thoroughly moving narrativr.  Thank you for sharing.

 Not to cheapen this unique story, , but the story "A River Runs Through It" comes to mind.​

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


go to top 
  Post Message
  
    Prior Page
 Page  
Next Page